Dossiê: Mercados transnacionais e suas ferramentas

Marcos Lopes Campos; Deborah Fromm; Vera da Silva Telles

doi:10.20336/rbs.1070

Authors

Marcos Lopes Campos Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
Deborah Fromm Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
Vera da Silva Telles Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.1070

Keywords:

transnational markets, technopolitics, market assemblages, mobilities

Abstract

This dossier, Transnational markets and their tools, brings together works that discuss the materiality of economic life and the production of markets through their objects, instruments, technologies and infrastructures. Its objective is to explore the various ways technologies, devices, graphic artifacts and techniques become specific modes of politics, highlighting their role in the fabric of transnational markets. The texts that comprise it do not treat globalization as a central theme, but rather take it as an unavoidable circumstance of the contemporary world, exploring what we could call globalized circuits and associated mobilities, with an emphasis on market agencements and their technopolitical dimensions. They thus offer an analytical prism for understanding how these mobilities and agencements can come to be connected on multiple scales, both globally and locally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcos Lopes Campos, Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento

Doutor em Sociologia pelo Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (IESP-UERJ) e pós-doutorando do International Postdoctoral Program no Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP).

Deborah Fromm, Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento

Doutora em Antropologia Social pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) com estágio de pesquisa no exterior na Goldsmiths College, Universidade de Londres e pesquisadora do Núcleo de Etnografias Urbanas (NEU/ CEBRAP).

Vera da Silva Telles, Universidade de São Paulo

Professora livre-docente sênior do Departamento de Sociologia da Universidade de São Paulo.

References

Amit, Vered, & Knowles, Caroline. (2017). Improvising and navigating mobilities: Tacking in everyday life. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(7-8), 165-179.

Anand, Nikhil. (2011). Pressure: The politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cultural anthropology, 26(4), 542-564.

Anand, Nikhil. (2015). Leaky states: Water audits, ignorance, and the politics of infrastructure. Public Culture, 27(2), 305-330.

Anand, Nikhil. (2022). Toxicity 1: On ambiguity and sewage in Mumbai's urban sea. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(4), 687-697.

Appadurai, Arjun (ed.). (1988). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Bear, Laura. (2020). Speculations on infrastructure: From colonial public works to a post-colonial global asset class on the Indian railways 1840–2017. Economy and Society, 49(1), 45-70.

Best, Jacqueline. (2012). Ambiguity and uncertainty in international organizations: A history of debating IMF conditionality. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 674-688.

Boltanski, Luc, & Thévenot, Laurent. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European journal of social theory, 2(3), 359-377.

Burawoy, Michael. (2001). Manufacturing the global. Ethnography, 2(2), 147-159.

Callon, Michel. (2021). Markets in the making: Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Princeton University Press.

Callon, Michel. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. The sociological review, 46(1_suppl.), 244-269.

Callon, Michel, Millo, Yuval, & Muniesa, Fabian. (2007). Market devices. Wiley-Blackwell.

Callon, Michel. (2021). Markets in the making: Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Princeton University Press.

Campos, Marcos L. (2016). O mercado de viagens e as disputas em torno das linhas de ônibus. Novos estudos CEBRAP, (35), 35-53.

Campos, Marcos L. (2021). Increasingly governing bus services through policy instruments. In: E.C.L. Marques (ed.). The politics of incremental progressivism: Governments, governances and urban policy changes in São Paulo (p. 136-154). Wiley.

Campos, Marcos L. (no prelo.a). ‘Fare money’ stories: transportation and everyday practices in the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

Campos, Marcos L. (no prelo.b). Rushing around: upward mobility and lives worth living in the peripheries of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Current Anthropology.

Farias, Ignacio. (2014). Improvising a market, making a model: social housing policy in Chile. Economy and Society, 43(3), 346-369.

Feltran, Gabriel (ed.). (2021). Stolen cars: a journey through São Paulo's urban conflict. John Wiley & Sons.

Foucault, Michel. (2010). The Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, Picador.

Freire-Medeiros, Bianca, Motta, Luana, & Fromm, Deborah. (2023). Carros globais, desigualdades transnacionais. Tempo Social, 35(1), 5-15.

Freire-Medeiros, Bianca, & Vianna, Isabela. (2024). Ancoradouros para pesquisas móveis: navegando o sistema de automobilidades a partir do Porto de Santos. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, 12, e-rbs.1031.

Fromm, Deborah. (2023). Insurance technopolitics: Car theft, recovery, and tracking systems in São Paulo. Security Dialogue, 54(1), 39-53.

Graham, Steve, & Marvin, Simon. (2001). Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London, Routledge.

Hecht, Gabrielle (ed.). (2011). Entangled geographies: Empire and technopolitics in the global Cold War. MIT Press.

Hull, Matthew S. (2012) Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. Univ. of California Press.

Knowles, Caroline. (2014). Trajetórias de um chinelo: microcenas da globalização. Contemporânea, 4(2), 289-289.

Lascoumes, Pierre, & Le Galès, Patrick. (2007). Introduction. Understanding public policy through its instruments: From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21.

Larkin, Brian. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual review of anthropology, 42(1), 327-343.

Latour, Bruno. (1996). Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, Harvard Univ. Press.

Latour, Bruno. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford Univ. Press.

Mackenzie, Donald. (2008). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Mit Press.

Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology, 24(1), 95-117.

Merriman, Peter. (2013). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9 (2), 167-18.

Mitchell, Timothy. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Univ of California Press.

Müller, Frank I., & Richmond, Matthew Aaron. (2023). The technopolitics of security: Agency, temporality, sovereignty. Security Dialogue, 54(1), 3-20.

Narotzky, Susana, & Besnier, Niko. (2014). Crisis, value, and hope: rethinking the economy: an introduction to supplement 9. Current anthropology, 55(S9), S4-S16.

Ortiz, Renato. (2009). Globalização: notas sobre um debate. Sociedade e Estado, 24(1), 231-254.

Pilo, Francesca; Jaffe, Rivke. (2020). Introduction: The political materiality of cities. City & Society, 32(1), 8-22.

Ribeiro, Gustavo L. (2010). A globalização popular e o sistema mundial não hegemônico. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 25, 21-38.

Roy, Ananya. (2011). Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory, 10(1), 6-15.

Sassen, Saskia. (2013). The global city: New york, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.

Scott, James C. (1998). Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

Simone, Abdou Maliq. (2004). For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press.

Sheller, Mimi, & Urry, John. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and planning A, 38(2), 207-226.

Söderström, Ola. (1996). Paper cities: visual thinking in urban planning. Ecumene, 3(3), 249-281.

Star, Susan L. (2020). A etnografia da infraestrutura. Revista Anthropológicas, 31(2).

Tarrius, Alain. (1993). Territoires circulatoires et espaces urbains: Différentiation des groupes migrants. Les Annales de la recherche urbaine, (59-60), 51-60.

Telles, Vera da S. (2006). Mutações do trabalho e experiência urbana. Tempo social, 18(1), 173-195.

Telles, Vera da S. (2010). A cidade nas fronteiras do legal e ilegal. Fino Traço.

Tsing, Anna. (2000). The global situation. Cultural anthropology, 15(3), 327-360.

Tsing, Anna. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.

Tsing, Anna. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.

Urry, John. (2003). Global Complexity. Polity Press.

Von Schnitzler, A. (2016). Democracy's infrastructure: Techno-Politics and protest after apartheid Princeton Univ. Press.

Wimmer, Andreas, & Glick Schiller, Nina. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2(4), 301-334.