Dossiê: Mercados transnacionais e suas ferramentas

Marcos Lopes Campos; Deborah Fromm; Vera da Silva Telles

doi:10.20336/rbs.1070

Autores

Marcos Lopes Campos Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
Deborah Fromm Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento
Vera da Silva Telles Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.1070

Palavras-chave:

mercados transnacionais, tecnopolítica, agenciamentos de mercado, mobilidades

Resumo

O presente dossiê Mercados transnacionais e suas ferramentas reúne trabalhos que discutem a materialidade da vida econômica e a produção de mercados através de seus objetos, instrumentos, tecnologias e infraestruturas. A aposta deste dossiê é explorar as diversas formas como as tecnologias, dispositivos, artefatos gráficos e técnicas se tornam modos específicos de política, sublinhando seu papel na tessitura de mercados transnacionais. Os textos que o compõem não tratam da globalização como tema central, mas a tomam como uma circunstância incontornável do mundo contemporâneo, explorando o que poderíamos chamar de circuitos globalizados e mobilidades associadas, com destaque para os agenciamentos de mercado e suas dimensões tecnopolíticas. Oferecem, assim, um prisma analítico para compreender como essas mobilidades e agenciamentos podem vir a se articular em múltiplas escalas, no global e no local.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Marcos Lopes Campos, Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento

Doutor em Sociologia pelo Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (IESP-UERJ) e pós-doutorando do International Postdoctoral Program no Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento (CEBRAP).

Deborah Fromm, Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento

Doutora em Antropologia Social pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) com estágio de pesquisa no exterior na Goldsmiths College, Universidade de Londres e pesquisadora do Núcleo de Etnografias Urbanas (NEU/ CEBRAP).

Vera da Silva Telles, Universidade de São Paulo

Professora livre-docente sênior do Departamento de Sociologia da Universidade de São Paulo.

Referências

Amit, Vered, & Knowles, Caroline. (2017). Improvising and navigating mobilities: Tacking in everyday life. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(7-8), 165-179.

Anand, Nikhil. (2011). Pressure: The politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cultural anthropology, 26(4), 542-564.

Anand, Nikhil. (2015). Leaky states: Water audits, ignorance, and the politics of infrastructure. Public Culture, 27(2), 305-330.

Anand, Nikhil. (2022). Toxicity 1: On ambiguity and sewage in Mumbai's urban sea. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(4), 687-697.

Appadurai, Arjun (ed.). (1988). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Bear, Laura. (2020). Speculations on infrastructure: From colonial public works to a post-colonial global asset class on the Indian railways 1840–2017. Economy and Society, 49(1), 45-70.

Best, Jacqueline. (2012). Ambiguity and uncertainty in international organizations: A history of debating IMF conditionality. International Studies Quarterly, 56(4), 674-688.

Boltanski, Luc, & Thévenot, Laurent. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European journal of social theory, 2(3), 359-377.

Burawoy, Michael. (2001). Manufacturing the global. Ethnography, 2(2), 147-159.

Callon, Michel. (2021). Markets in the making: Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Princeton University Press.

Callon, Michel. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: economic externalities revisited by sociology. The sociological review, 46(1_suppl.), 244-269.

Callon, Michel, Millo, Yuval, & Muniesa, Fabian. (2007). Market devices. Wiley-Blackwell.

Callon, Michel. (2021). Markets in the making: Rethinking competition, goods, and innovation. Princeton University Press.

Campos, Marcos L. (2016). O mercado de viagens e as disputas em torno das linhas de ônibus. Novos estudos CEBRAP, (35), 35-53.

Campos, Marcos L. (2021). Increasingly governing bus services through policy instruments. In: E.C.L. Marques (ed.). The politics of incremental progressivism: Governments, governances and urban policy changes in São Paulo (p. 136-154). Wiley.

Campos, Marcos L. (no prelo.a). ‘Fare money’ stories: transportation and everyday practices in the peripheries of Rio de Janeiro. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.

Campos, Marcos L. (no prelo.b). Rushing around: upward mobility and lives worth living in the peripheries of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Current Anthropology.

Farias, Ignacio. (2014). Improvising a market, making a model: social housing policy in Chile. Economy and Society, 43(3), 346-369.

Feltran, Gabriel (ed.). (2021). Stolen cars: a journey through São Paulo's urban conflict. John Wiley & Sons.

Foucault, Michel. (2010). The Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, Picador.

Freire-Medeiros, Bianca, Motta, Luana, & Fromm, Deborah. (2023). Carros globais, desigualdades transnacionais. Tempo Social, 35(1), 5-15.

Freire-Medeiros, Bianca, & Vianna, Isabela. (2024). Ancoradouros para pesquisas móveis: navegando o sistema de automobilidades a partir do Porto de Santos. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, 12, e-rbs.1031.

Fromm, Deborah. (2023). Insurance technopolitics: Car theft, recovery, and tracking systems in São Paulo. Security Dialogue, 54(1), 39-53.

Graham, Steve, & Marvin, Simon. (2001). Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London, Routledge.

Hecht, Gabrielle (ed.). (2011). Entangled geographies: Empire and technopolitics in the global Cold War. MIT Press.

Hull, Matthew S. (2012) Government of paper: The materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. Univ. of California Press.

Knowles, Caroline. (2014). Trajetórias de um chinelo: microcenas da globalização. Contemporânea, 4(2), 289-289.

Lascoumes, Pierre, & Le Galès, Patrick. (2007). Introduction. Understanding public policy through its instruments: From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21.

Larkin, Brian. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual review of anthropology, 42(1), 327-343.

Latour, Bruno. (1996). Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, Harvard Univ. Press.

Latour, Bruno. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford Univ. Press.

Mackenzie, Donald. (2008). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Mit Press.

Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology, 24(1), 95-117.

Merriman, Peter. (2013). Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities, 9 (2), 167-18.

Mitchell, Timothy. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Univ of California Press.

Müller, Frank I., & Richmond, Matthew Aaron. (2023). The technopolitics of security: Agency, temporality, sovereignty. Security Dialogue, 54(1), 3-20.

Narotzky, Susana, & Besnier, Niko. (2014). Crisis, value, and hope: rethinking the economy: an introduction to supplement 9. Current anthropology, 55(S9), S4-S16.

Ortiz, Renato. (2009). Globalização: notas sobre um debate. Sociedade e Estado, 24(1), 231-254.

Pilo, Francesca; Jaffe, Rivke. (2020). Introduction: The political materiality of cities. City & Society, 32(1), 8-22.

Ribeiro, Gustavo L. (2010). A globalização popular e o sistema mundial não hegemônico. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 25, 21-38.

Roy, Ananya. (2011). Urbanisms, worlding practices and the theory of planning. Planning Theory, 10(1), 6-15.

Sassen, Saskia. (2013). The global city: New york, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.

Scott, James C. (1998). Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.

Simone, Abdou Maliq. (2004). For the city yet to come: Changing African life in four cities. Duke University Press.

Sheller, Mimi, & Urry, John. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and planning A, 38(2), 207-226.

Söderström, Ola. (1996). Paper cities: visual thinking in urban planning. Ecumene, 3(3), 249-281.

Star, Susan L. (2020). A etnografia da infraestrutura. Revista Anthropológicas, 31(2).

Tarrius, Alain. (1993). Territoires circulatoires et espaces urbains: Différentiation des groupes migrants. Les Annales de la recherche urbaine, (59-60), 51-60.

Telles, Vera da S. (2006). Mutações do trabalho e experiência urbana. Tempo social, 18(1), 173-195.

Telles, Vera da S. (2010). A cidade nas fronteiras do legal e ilegal. Fino Traço.

Tsing, Anna. (2000). The global situation. Cultural anthropology, 15(3), 327-360.

Tsing, Anna. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.

Tsing, Anna. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.

Urry, John. (2003). Global Complexity. Polity Press.

Von Schnitzler, A. (2016). Democracy's infrastructure: Techno-Politics and protest after apartheid Princeton Univ. Press.

Wimmer, Andreas, & Glick Schiller, Nina. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks, 2(4), 301-334.