Electronic anklets, mobilities and construction of subjectivities

The constitution of a criminal surveillance infrastructure

Visualizações: 171

Authors

  • Helena Lancellotti Professora do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Campus Restinga https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-4258

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.941

Keywords:

infrastructure, electronic ankle bracelets, subjectivities, mobility, objects

Abstract

This article is aimed at understanding the constitution of a criminal surveillance infrastructure that allows the (i)mmobility of people with electronic anklets in the city of Porto Alegre and the effects of this management in the daily lives of convicts. Electronic ankle bracelets have been the main technology used in the electronic monitoring of prisoners outside prison facilities. They carry promises of rehabilitation and of reduction of costs, prison overcrowding and surveillance. The operation of the electronic ankle bracelet occurs through the constitution of a criminal surveillance infrastructure, where human and non-human elements are connected at different scales, allowing its functionality, and whose effects are contingent. These connections were understood through multi-sited field work based on observation and interviews with professionals working in electronic monitoring in Porto Alegre, justice agents and with monitored people and their family networks, in addition to the analysis of booklets and legislation. Reflecting on this technology means understanding it as an object and as part of a surveillance infrastructure, in which a series of scales connect not only technical elements, but ways of governing, classifying and surveilling movements and of allowing or disallowing people's mobility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Helena Lancellotti, Professora do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Campus Restinga

Professora do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul –
Campus Restinga. Doutora em Antropologia Social pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em
Antropologia Social da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

References

Anand, Nikhil. (2011) Pressure: The politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cultural Anthropology, 26 (4), 542-564.

Anand, Nikhil. (2012) Municipal disconnect: On abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography, 13 (4), 487-509.

Appel, Hannah, Anand, Nikhil; Gupta, Akhil. (2018) Introduction: Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In: Appel, Hannah; Anand, Nikhil; Gupta, Akhil (org.). The promise of infrastructure. Duke University Press.

Barry, Andrew. (2020). The material politics of infrastructure. In: Maasen S. et al. (eds,) TechnoScienceSociety. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook (p. 91- 109). Springer, Cham.

Campello, Ricardo. (2019) Faces e interfaces de um dispositivo tecnopenal: o monitoramento eletrônico de presos e presas no Brasil. (Tese de Doutorado em Sociologia). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo.

Chies, Luiz Antônio Bogo. (2006). A capitalização do tempo social na prisão: a remição no contexto das lutas de temporalização na pena privativa de liberdade. (Tese de Doutorado em Sociologia). Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Di Nunzio, Marco. (2018). Anthropology of Infrastructure. Governing Infrastructure Interfaces, Research Note 01 (June 2018). LSE Cities working paper.

Ferguson, James. (2010). The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode, 41, 166-184.

Foucault, Michel. (2008). Segurança, território, população. Martins Fontes.

Gonçalves, Vanessa Chiari (2018). A prisão domiciliar com monitoramento eletrônico como alternativa ao regime semiaberto: a experiência da Comarca de Porto Alegre. Revista brasileira de ciências criminais, 143, 221-244.

Gonçalves, Vanessa Chiari; Danckwardt, Ceres. (2017) O monitoramento eletrônico de mulheres na comarca de Porto Alegre. Revista da Defensoria Pública, 17, 131-149.

Harvey, Penny, Knox, Hannah. (2015) Roads: An anthropology of infrastructure and expertise. Cornell University Press.

Harvey, Penelope, Jensen, Casper B., & Morita, Atsuro (2016) Introduction: Infrastructural complications. In: Harvey, P. et al. (org.) Infrastructures and social complexity: A companion. Routledge

Harvey, Penny. (2018) Infrastructures in and out of time: The promise of roads in contemporary Peru. In: Appel, H. et al. (org.). The promise of infrastructure (p. 80-101). Duke University Press.

Larkin, Brian. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual review of anthropology, 42, 327-343.

Marcus, George E. (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

Merriman, Peter. (2016). Mobility infrastructures: Modern visions, affective environments and the problem of car parking. Mobilities, 11 (1), 83-98.

Nellis, Mike, Beyens, Kristel, & Kaminski, Dan. (2013). Electronically monitored punishment: International and critical perspectives. Routledge.

Ong, Aihwa. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32 (1), 3-8.

Simone, AbdouMaliq. (2004) People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public culture, 16 (3), 407-429.

Soares, Cynthia. (2018) A experiência do monitoramento eletrônico nos apenados do regime semiaberto da comarca de Porto Alegre. (Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso em Direito), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Von Schnitzler, Antina. (2013). Traveling technologies: Infrastructure, ethical regimes, and the materiality of politics in South Africa. Cultural Anthropology, 28 (4), 670-693.

Von Schnitzler, Antina. (2016). Democracy's infrastructure: Techno-politics and protest after apartheid. Princeton University Press.

Published

26-10-2023

How to Cite

Lancellotti, H. (2023). Electronic anklets, mobilities and construction of subjectivities: The constitution of a criminal surveillance infrastructure. Brazilian Journal of Sociology, 11(28), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.941