Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field

Visualizações: 4048

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.910

Keywords:

sociological research, domination, species of capital, field of power

Abstract

The notion of field was gradually developed by Pierre Bourdieu, firstly based on research on intellectuals, writers and the scientific world, as well as thanks to rereadings of Max Weber, in particular on religions. To think in terms of field is first to think relationally, and to think of power relations and relationships of struggle and domination. This text does not attempt to define field, but rather to evoke, even if in a somewhat subjective way, some important and central points of this theory that Bourdieu was developing. It also raises some questions about the sometimes abusive use of the notion of field in order to call for vigilance in its use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Monique de Saint Martin, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales

Socióloga, Diretora de estudos na EHESS e pesquisadora do IRIS, ingressou na VIª seção da EPHE, no CSE em Paris, em 1963. Após pesquisas voltadas para a sociologia da educação, dedicou-se à sociologia do poder, das elites e das antigas aristocracias (cf. L’espace de la noblesse), interessando-se pelos processos de reconversão das antigas elites e, atualmente, das elites africanas formadas na URSS ou em países do antigo bloco socialista. Participou ativamente da construção de diferentes grupos e redes de pesquisa internacional.

References

Bourdieu, Pierre. (2022). Microcosmes. Théorie des champs. In J. Bourdieu & F. Poupeau (ed.), Raisons d’agir.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes. Liber.

Bourdieu Pierre. (1989). La noblesse d’état, grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Ed. de Minuit.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1984). Homo academicus. Ed. de Minuit.

Bourdieu, Pierre. (1974). A economia das trocas simbólicas (col. Estudos). Perspectiva.

Bourdieu, Pierre, & Saint Martin, Monique de. (1982). La sainte famille. L'épiscopat français dans le champ du pouvoir religieux. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, (44-45), 2-53.

Bourdieu, Pierre, & Wacquant, Loïc J. D., (1992). Réponses. Pour une anthropologie réflexive (Libre examen Politique). Le Seuil.

Castel, Robert. (2004). Entre la contrainte sociale et le volontarisme politique. In J. Bouveresse & D. Roche (org.), La liberté par la connaissance. Pierre Bourdieu. 1930-2002 (pp. 303-317). Ed. Odile Jacob.

Chmatko, Natacha. (1994). Les entrepreneurs en Russie : genèse d'un nouveau groupe social (Introdução de Monique de Saint Martin). CSEC, MSH.

Durand, José Carlos. (1990). Mercado de arte e campo artístico em São Paulo, 1947-1980. Revista brasileira de ciências sociais, 5(13).

Grün, Roberto. (2013). A dominação financeira no Brasil contemporâneo. Tempo social, 25(1), 179-213. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702013000100010

Lemieux, Cyril. (2011). Le crépuscule des champs. Limites d’un concept ou disparition d’une réalité historique ? In M. de Fornel & A. Ogien (org.), Bourdieu théoricien de la pratique (col. Raisons pratiques). Ed. de l’EHESS.

Loureiro, Maria Rita. (1995). L’ascension des économistes au Brésil. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 108, 70-78. https://www.persee.fr/doc/arss_0335-5322_1995_num_108_1_3148

Miceli, Sergio. (1981). Les intellectuels et le pouvoir au Brésil 1920-1945. PUG-MSH.

Perrot, Michelle. (1998, 27 ago.). Bourdieu et le mâle absolu. Femmes encore un effort. Libération. Recuperado de: https://www.liberation.fr/livres/1998/08/27/bourdieu-et-le-male-absolu-femmes-encore-un-efforton-peut-adherer-aux-theses-de-bourdieu-et-s-etonne_244473/

Pouillon, Jean et al. (1968). Problemas do estruturalismo. Zahar.

Saint Martin, Monique de. (2022). A propósito de um encontro entre pesquisadores : Ciências Sociais e política no Brasil. Política e Sociedade, 21(50), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e89621

Published

02-02-2023

How to Cite

Saint Martin, M. de. (2023). Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field . Brazilian Journal of Sociology, 10(26). https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.910