Technology as enabler of the automation of work? Current societal challenges for a future perspective of work / A tecnologia como facilitadora da automação do trabalho? Desafios sociais atuais para uma visão do futuro do trabalho
Visualizações: 370DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.806Resumo
Due to the innovative possibilities of digital technologies, the issue of increasing automation is once again on the agenda – and not only in the industry, but also in other branches and sectors of contemporary societies. Although public and scientific discussions about automation seem to raise relevant questions of the “old” debate, such as the replacement of human labor by introducing new technologies, the authors focus here on the new contextual quality of these questions. The debate should rethink the relationship between technology and work with regard to quantitative and qualitative changes in work. In this article, our example will be the introduction of automation in industry, which has been reflected in the widely recognized study by Frey and Osborne in 2013. They estimated the expected impacts of future computerization on US labor market outcomes as very high, specifically regarding the number of jobs at risk. Surprisingly, this study was the starting point of an intensive international debate on the impact of technologies on the future of work and the role of technological change in working environments. Thus, according to the authors, “old” questions remain important, but they should be reinterpreted for “new” societal demands and expectations of future models of work.
Keywords: automation, technical unemployment, transformation of work, new models of work
***
Em virtude das possibilidades de inovação colocadas pelas tecnologias digitais, vem crescendo o debate sobre o aumento da automação – não apenas na indústria, mas também em outros ramos e setores das sociedades contemporâneas. Embora os debates público e científico sobre automação pareçam focar questões relevantes do “antigo” debate, como a substituição do trabalho humano pela introdução de novas tecnologias, os autores concentram-se, aqui, no novo aspecto contextual dessas questões. O debate precisa repensar a relação entre tecnologia e trabalho no que concerne às mudanças quantitativas e qualitativas no trabalho. Neste artigo, nosso exemplo será a introdução da automação na indústria, que se refletiu no estudo amplamente reconhecido de Frey e Osborne, de 2013. Eles estimaram impactos profundos da futura informatização sobre os desfechos do mercado de trabalho dos EUA, particularmente em relação ao número de empregos em risco. Surpreendentemente, este estudo foi o ponto de partida para um intenso debate internacional sobre o impacto das tecnologias no futuro do trabalho e o papel da mudança tecnológica nos ambientes de trabalho. Assim, de acordo com os autores, embora as “velhas” questões permaneçam importantes, elas devem ser reinterpretadas considerando as “novas” demandas sociais e expectativas de modelos futuros de trabalho.
Palavras-chave: automação, desemprego técnico, transformação do trabalho, novos modelos de trabalho.
Downloads
Referências
Acemoglu, Daron & Restrepo, Pascual. (2017). Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets. Working Paper, no. 23285. NBER – National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w23285
Acemoglu, Daron & Restrepo, Pascual. (2019). Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor. Discussion Paper Series, no. 12293. IZA ´Institute of Labor Economics.
Anderson, Roger L.; Gartner, William B. (1985). When robots and people work together, Robotics, 1(2), 69-76.
Arntz, Melanie, Gregory, Terry. & Zierahn, Ulrich. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.or g/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
Autor, David H., Levy, Frank & Murnane, Richard J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333
Barbosa, Carlos E. et al. (2017). Working in 2050: a view of how changes on the work will affect society. Rio de Janeiro: Laboratório do Futuro – UFRJ.
Baukrowitz, Andrea; Berker, Thomas; Boes, Andreas; Pfeiffer, Sabine; Schmiede, Rudi; Will, Mascha (Ed.)(2006) Informatisierung der Arbeit – Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Berlin: edition sigma
Bernstein, Debra, Crowley, Kevin & Nourbakhsh, Illah R. (2007). Working with a robot: Exploring relationship potential in human-robot systems. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 465-482.
Boes, Andreas, & Pfeiffer, Sabine. (2006). Informatisierung der Arbeit – Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Eine Einführung. In Andrea Baukrowitz et al. (eds.) Informatisierung der Arbeit – Gesellschaft im Umbruch. (pp. 19-34) Berlin: Sigma.
Bonin, Holger, Gregory, Terry & Zierahn, Ulrich. (2015). Übertragung der Studie von Frey und Osborne (2013) auf Deutschland. Kurzexpertise no. 57, Mannheim, ZEW. [http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/gutachten/Kurzexpertise_BMAS_ZEW2015.pdf].
Brödner, Peter. (2007). From Taylorism to competence-based production. AI & Society, 21(4), 497-514.
Brynjolfsson, Erik & McAfee, Andrew. (2011). The race against the machine: how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, KY: Digital Frontier Press.
Brynjolfsson, Erik & McAfee, Andrew. (2014). The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Brzeski, Carsten & Burk, Inga. (2015). Die Roboter kommen: Folgen der Automatisierung für den deutschen Arbeitsmarkt. Economic Research. Frankfurt am Main: ING-DiBa [https://www.ing-diba.de/pdf/ueber-uns/presse/publikationen/ing-diba-economic-analysis-die-roboter-kommen.pdf].
Butera, Frederico. (2015). Automation: organizational studies. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition, v. 2. Elsevier.
Caetano Da Rosa, Catarina. (2013). Operationsroboter in Aktion. Kontroverse Innovationen in der Medizintechnik. Bielefeld: transcript-Verlag.
Castells, Manuel. (1996). The rise of the network society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, v. I. Cambridge, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Cole, Matt. (2019). Automation. Autonomy.work. [https://autonomy.work/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Automation-V6.pdf]
Corbett, J. Martin, Rasmussen, Lauge B. & Rauner, Felix. (1991). Crossing the border. The social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. London/Berlin: Springer.
Drews, Paul. (2011). Telemedicine – ICT based transformation of knowledge-intensive work in health care. In: Bettina-Johanna Krings (ed.) Brain drain or brain gain? Changes of work in knowledge-based societies (pp. 129-150). Berlin: Edition Sigma: Berlin.
EPTA - European Parliamentary Technology Assessment. (2016). The Future of Labour in the Digital Era: Ubiquitous Computing, Virtual Platforms, and Real-time Production. Vienna: EPTA. [epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-projektberichte/EPTA-2016-Digital-Labour.pdf]
Fischer, Martin; Krings, Bettina-Johanna, Moniz, António B. & Zimpelmann, Eike. (2017) Herausforderungen der Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration. Lernen & Lehren, 32 (125), 8–14.
Flecker, Jörg, Holtgrewe, Ursula, Schönauer, Annika, Dunkel, Wolfgang & Meil, Pamela. (2008): Restructuring across value chains and changes in work and employment. Case study evidence from the Clothing, Food, IT and Public Sector. WP 10 Organisational Case Studies – Synthesis Report. WORKS-Work organisation and restructuring in the knowledge society.
Frey, Carl B. & Osborne, Michael A. (2013): The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford: The Oxford Martin School.
Greenan, Nathalie, Kocoglu, Yusuf, Walkowiak, Emmanuelle, Csizmadia, Péter & Makó, Csaba. (2009). The role of technology in value chain restructuring. WORKS-Work organisation and restructuring in the knowledge society.
Greenfield, Adam. (2018). Radical technologies: the design of everyday life. London: Verson.
Guimarães, Sonia K. (2019). Dossier: Sociological perspectives on the new digital technologies, Sociologies in Dialogue, 5(1), 2-9. doi: 10.20336/sid.v5i1.109
Helmrich, Robert et al. (2016). Digitalisierung der Arbeitslandschaften. Keine Polarisierung der Arbeitswelt, aber beschleunigter Strukturwandel und Arbeitsplatzwechsel. Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung, Wissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere, no. 180. [https://www.bibb.de/veroeffentlichungen/de/publication/download/8169]
Heyer, Clint. (2010). Human-robot interaction and future industrial robotics applications. In 2010 IEEE/RSJ: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. (pp. 4749-4754). Taipei, IEEE.
Hessler, Martina. (2015). Die Ersetzung des Menschen? Die Debatte des Mensch-Maschinen-Verhältnisses im Automatisierungsdiskurs. Technikgeschichte, 82(2), 110-136.
Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut & Karačić, Anemari. (orgs.). (2019). Logistikarbeit in der digitalen Wertschöpfung – Perspektiven und Herausforderungenfür Arbeit durch technologische Erneuerungen. Tagungsdokumentation. Düsseldorf: FGW
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2016). The future of work in the twenty-first century. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(1), 197–216.
Huws, Ursula (ed.). (2006). The transformation of work in a global knowledge economy: towards a conceptual framework. Workpackage 3: Theories and concepts. WORKS-Work organisation and restructuring in the knowledge society.
Huws, Ursula. (2007). Defragmenting: towards a critical understanding of the new global division of labour. Work organization, Labour & Globalization, 1(2), 1-4.
Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. (org.) (1976). Die Humanisierung – Industriearbeit im Wandel. Köln.
Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
Kern, Horst & Schumann, Michael. (1988). El fin de la división del trabajo. Racionalización en la producción industrial. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.
Krings, Bettina-Johanna. (2007). Die Krise der Arbeitsgesellschaft. Einführung in den Schwerpunkt. Technikfolgenabschätzung Theorie und Praxis (TATuP), 16(2), 4-12.
Krings, Bettina-Johanna (ed.). (2011) Brain drain or brain gain? Changes of work in knowledge-based societies. Edition Sigma: Berlin
Krings, Bettina-Johanna. (2013). Arbeit und Technik. In Armin Grunwald (ed.). Handbuch Technikethik (pp.217-222). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.
Lawrence, Mathew, Roberts, Carys & King, Loren. (2017). Managing automation. Employment, inequality and ethics in the digital age. Discussion Paper. IPPR Commission on Economic Justice. http://www.ippr.org/publications/managing-automation
Lenz, Claus. (2011). Context-aware human-robot collaboration as a basis for future cognitive factories. PhD thesis, Munich: Technische Universität München.
Manyika, James et al. (2017). A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity. S. Francisco: McKinsey & Co.
Mason, Paul. (2015). PostCapitalism: a guide to our future. London: Penguin.
McKinsey & Company. (2019). Automação e futuro do emprego em Portugal. Lisbon: McKinsey & Company.
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jørgen & Behrens, William W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Moniz, António B. (2012). Anthropocentric-based robotic and autonomous systems: assessment for new organisational options. In Michael Decker and Mathias Gutmann (eds.). Robo- and Informationethics: some fundamentals.( pp. 123-157). Zurich: LIT.
Moniz, António B. (2014). Organisational challenges of human-robot interaction systems in industry: human resources implications, in: Machado, C.; Davim, J.P. (Hrsg.): Human Resource Management and Technological Challenges. Cham Heidelberg New York u.a.: Springer, p. 123-131.
Moniz, António B. (2018). Robótica e trabalho: o futuro hoje. Lisbon: Glaciar/FLAD.
Moniz, António B. & Krings, Bettina-Johanna. (2016). Robots working with humans or humans working with robots? Searching for social dimensions in new human-robot interaction in industry. Societies, 6(3), 23.
Nassehi, Armin. (2019). Muster. Theorien der digitalen Gesellschaft. München: C. H. Beck Verlag.
Noon, Mike & Blyton, Paul. (1997). The realities of work – experiencing work and employment in contemporary society. London: Macmillan.
Pellizzari, Michele & Fichen, Anne (2013). A new measure of skills mismatch: theory and evidence from the survey of adult skills (PIAAC). OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 153. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5k3tpt04lcnt-en
Pfeiffer, Sabine. (2010). Technisierung von Arbeit. In Fritz Böhle, G. Günter Voß & Günter Wachtler (eds.). Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie. (p. 231-262) Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Pfeiffer, Sabine. (2016). Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or Why assembly work is more than routine work. Societies, 6(2), 16.
Pfeiffer, Sabine. (2017). The vision of ‘Industrie 4.0’ in the making - Case of future told, tamed, and traded. Nanoethics, 11(1), 107–121, doi: 10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3
Prewett, Matthew S. et al. (2010). Managing workload in human-robot interaction: A review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 840-856.
Ramioul, Monique. (2008). Work organisation and restructuring in the knowledge society. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 4(4), 9-19.
Ritter, Helge, Sagerer, Gerhard, Dillmann, Rüdiger & Buss, Martin (eds.). (2009). Human centered robot systems. Cognition, interaction, technology. Berlin: Springer.
Sandberg, Thomas. (1982). Work organization and autonomous groups. Lund: LiberFörlag.
Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo. (2013). Scenarios as patterns of orientation in technology development and technology assessment. Outline of a research program. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9(1), p. 23-44.
Schumann, Michael. (2013). Das Jahrhundert der Industriearbeit. Soziologische Erkenntnisse und Ausblicke. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Verlag.
Srnicek, Nick & Williams, Alex. (2015). Inventing the future. Postcapitalism and a world without work. London: Verso Books.
Thrun, Sebastian. (2004). Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction,19 (1-2), 9-24.
Van Den Besselaar, Peter, Clements, Andrew & Jarvinen, Pertti (eds.). (1991). Information system, work and organization design. Amsterdam: North-Holland/IFIP.
Van Est, Rinie & Kools, Linda (eds.). (2015). Working on the robot society. The Hague: Rathenau Instituut.
Wehling, Peter, Viehöfer, Willy & Koenen, Sophia (eds.) (2015): The public shaping of medical research. Patient associations, health movements and biomedicine. London, New York: Routledge.
Zuboff, Shoshana. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. New York: Basic Books: New York.
Zuboff, Shoshana. (2010). Creating value in the age of distributed capitalism. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45–55.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
