Arquitetura de mercados como processo social:
trazendo o direito para a sociologia econômica institucionalista
Visualizações: 744DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.833Palavras-chave:
institucionalismo, sociologia econômica, mercados, direito, recursividadeResumo
Abordagens institucionalistas da sociologia econômica mostram que Estados arquitetam mercados e revelam, assim, a variedade de configurações institucionais da relação Estados-mercados em diferentes países. Menos atenção tem sido dada, contudo, aos processos pelos quais Estados, em meio a dinâmicas políticas, constroem, estruturam e regulam tais mercados. Neste artigo, argumentamos que uma razão subjacente a isso é o fato de que o direito, embora por vezes referido, é insuficientemente considerado nesses estudos. O argumento é desenvolvido a partir de um diálogo com os trabalhos de Dobbin, Fligstein e Vogel. Defendemos que tomar o fenômeno jurídico (i) como constitutivo de mercados e da ação estatal; (ii) como parte da disputa social em torno da institucionalidade; e (iii) como mecanismo estruturante das relações entre os planos doméstico e internacional, contribui, do ponto de vista analítico, para melhor compreender o processo social que subjaz à arquitetura de mercados.
Downloads
Referências
Blyth, Mark. (2002). Great transformations: The rise and decline of embedded liberalism. Cambridge University Press.
Carruthers, Bruce. (2015). Financialization and the institutional foundations of the new capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 13(2), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv008
Chambliss, William. (1979). On Lawmaking. British Journal of Law and Society, 6(2), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409765
Cotterrell, Roger. (2002). Subverting orthodoxy, making law central: A view of sociolegal studies. Journal of Law and Society, 29(4), 632-644.
Coutinho, Diogo R. (2017). Direito e institucionalismo econômico: apontamentos sobre uma fértil agenda de pesquisa. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 37(3), 565-586. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572017v37n03a06
Coutinho, Diogo R. (2015). Direito econômico e desenvolvimento democrático: uma abordagem institucional [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo]. Disponível em https://repositorio.usp.br/item/002681510.
Coutinho, Diogo R. (2013). O direito nas políticas públicas. In E. Marques & C. A. P. Faria (Orgs.), A Política Pública como Campo Multidisciplinar (pp. 181-206). Editora UNESP;Editora Fiocruz.
Coutinho, Diogo R., & Schapiro, Mario G. (2013). Economia Política e Direito Econômico: do desenvolvimentismo aos desafios da retomada do ativismo estatal. In J. A. F. Costa, J. M. A. de Andrade, & A. M. H. Matsuo (Orgs.), Direito: teoria e experiência. Estudos em homenagem a Eros Roberto Grau (Vol. 1, pp. 581-617). Malheiros Editores.
Deakins, Simon et al. (2015). Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of Law. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 26.
Dobbin, Frank. (1993). The social construction of the Great Depression: Industrial policy during the 1930s in the United States, Britain, and France. Theory and Society, 22(1), 1-56.
Dobbin, Frank. (2004). Introduction: The sociology of the economy. In F. Dobbin (Ed.), The Sociology of the Economy (pp. 1-25). Russell Sage Foundation.
Dobbin, Frank. (1994) Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. Cambridge University Press.
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, & Garret, Geoffrey. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-72. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, & Garret, Geoffrey. (2008). Introduction: The diffusion of liberalization. In B. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 1-63). Cambridge University Press.
Edelman, Lauren B. (2004). Rivers of law and contested terrain: A law and society approach to economic rationality. Law & Society Review, 38(2), 181-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03802003.x
Edelman, Lauren, & Stryker, Robin. (2004). A Sociological Approach to Law and the Economy. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 527-551). PUP.
Faria, José E. C. de O. (1999). O Direito na economia globalizada. Editora Malheiros.
Fligstein, Neil. (1996). Markets as politics: A political-cultural approach to market institutions. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 656-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096398
Fligstein, Neil, (2001). The architecture of markets. An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton University Press.
Fligstein, Neil, & McAdam, Doug. (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion, & Babb, Sarah. (2002). The rebirth of the liberal creed: Paths to neoliberalism in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 108(3), 533-579. https://doi.org/10.1086/367922
Funk, Russell J., & Hirschman, Daniel. (2012). Rethinking endogenous legal change: How organizations re-shaped Glass-Steagall. Paper presented at Workshop, University of Michigan, June 16.
Gershenson, Carl, & Dobin, Frank. (2014). Institutions and the economy. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the behavioral and social sciences. Wiley and Sons.
Hall, Peter. A. & Soskice, David W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
Halliday, Terence C., & Carruthers, Bruce G. (2007). The recursivity of law: Global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology, 112(4), 1135-1202. https://doi.org/10.1086/507855
Halliday, Terence C., & Carruthers, Bruce G. (2009). Bankrupt: Global lawmaking and systemic financial crisis. Stanford University Press.
Halperin, Jean-Louis. (2011). Law in books and law in action: The problem of legal change. Maine Law Review, 64(1), 45-76.
Hay, Colin. (1999). Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 1(3), 317-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00018
Hay, Colin (2016). Good in a crisis: The ontological institutionalism of social constructivism. New Political Economy, 21(6), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2016.1158800
Hay, Colin. (2008) Constructivist institutionalism. In S. A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (pp. 56-73). Oxford University Press.
Hirsch, Paul, Michaels, Stuart, & Friedman, Ray. (1987). “Dirty hands” versus “clean models”: Is Sociology in danger of being seduced by Economics? Theory and Society, 16(3), 317-336.
Krippner, Greta. (2007). The making of US monetary policy: Central Bank transparency and the neoliberal dilemma. Theory and Society, 36(6), 477-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9043-z
Lowi, Theodore. (1964). American Business, Public Policy Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677-715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452
Lowi, Theodore. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.2307/974990
Mahoney, James A., & Thelen, Katheleen. (2010). Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In K. Thelen & J. Mahoney (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
Miola, Iagê, & Picciotto, Sol. (2021). On the Sociology of Law in Economic Relations. Social & Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639211002881
Monteiro, Cristiano. (2009). Estado e mercado no transporte aéreo brasileiro pós-reformas. Política e Sociedade, 8(15), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2009v8n15p117
Mouallem, Pedro S. B. (2021). Forjando mercados com ferramentas jurídicas: uma agenda de pesquisa sociojurídica. Revista Direito e Práxis, 12(1), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2020/46738
Pardi, Tommaso. (2014). From markets as politics to the politics of markets: Unpacking the relationship between state and firms. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 15(2), 7-16.
Perry-Kessaris, Amanda. (2015). Approaching the econo-socio-legal. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121542
Pistor, Katharina. (2019). The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton University Press.
Pistor, Katharina. (2013). A legal theory of finance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(2), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.03.003
Prado, Mariana. (2009). Should we adopt a “what works” approach in law and development? Northwestern University Law Review, 104, 174-185.
Ravid, Maayan, & Scheneider, Alice. (2020). Legal concepts in flux: the social construction of legal meaning. In N. Creutzfeldt, M. Mason, & K. McConnachie (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods (Cap. 18). Routledge.
Rose, Nikolas, & Valverde, Mariana. (1998). Governed by Law? Social & Legal Studies, 7(4), 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399800700405
Schmidt, Vivien. (2010). Reconciling ideas and institutions through discursive institutionalism. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 64-88). Oxford University Press.
Scott, W. Richard. (2014). Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests and identities (4. ed.). Stanford University.
Scoville, Caleb, & Fligstein, Neil. (2020). The promise of Field Theory for the study of political institutions. In T. Janoski et al (Eds.), The new handbook of Political Sociology (pp. 79-101). Cambridge University Press.
Shaffer, Gregory. (2009). How business shapes law: A socio-legal framework. Connecticut Law Review, 42(1), 147-183.
Streeck, Wolfgang, & Thelen, Katheleen. (2005). Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford University Press.
Stryker, Robin. (2000). Legitimacy Processes as institutional politics: Implications for theory and research in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17, 179-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(00)17006-5
Stryker, Robin, (2003). Mind the gap: Law, institutional analysis and socioeconomics. Socio-Economic Review, 1(3), 335-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.3.335
Suchman, Mark C., & Edelman, Lauren B. (1996). Legal rational myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry, 21(4), 902-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1996.tb00100.x
Swedberg, Richard. (2003). The case for an Economic Sociology of Law. Theory and Society, 32(1), 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023005905397
Thelen, Katheleen. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
Vogel, Steven. (1996). Freer markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Cornell University Press.
Vogel, Steven. (2018). Marketcraft: How governments make markets work. Oxford University Press.
Widmaier, Wesley, Blyth, Mark, & Seabrooke, Leonard. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00474
Wilkinson, Michael, & Lokdan, Hjalte. (2018). Law and political economy. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers (7/2018).
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Pedro Salomon Bezerra Mouallem, Diogo Rosenthal Coutinho
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
